Unit 6 Assignment Case Study
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 90
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Estimated time to complete: 90 minutes
Instructions
Watch the media presentation describing a Game Theory Scenario: the Prisoners Dilemma.
Read the Case Studies found under Assignment Files below.
Pick one of the case studies to analyze. Set-up the analysis by using a similar matrix to what has been shown in the presentation (and script).
Discuss the possible decisions that could be made and the outcomes that could occur with each decision.
This application assignment should be uploaded as a Word document of at least 350 words. Correct APA style should be used. At least one citation should be added.
Assignment Files
Unit 6 Game Theory Scenario Audio [MP4]
Unit 6 Game Theory Scenario Transcript [Word Document]
New Drug Therapies for Weight Loss Case Study [Printable PDF]
Nursing Home Bed Vacancies Case Study [Printable PDF]
The Cost of Nursing Home Beds Case Study [Printable PDF]
The Development of Competing MRI Services Case Study [Printable PDF]
Rubric
HC402 Unit 6 Assignment Case Study
HC402 Unit 6 Assignment Case Study
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content
30.0 pts Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
27.0 pts Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
24.0 pts Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
21.0 pts Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
18.0 pts Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.
0.0 pts Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Analysis PRICE-P
40.0 pts Level 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
36.0 pts Level 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
32.0 pts Level 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
28.0 pts Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
24.0 pts Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0.0 pts Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing
10.0 pts Level 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
9.0 pts Level 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
8.0 pts Level 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
7.0 pts Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
6.0 pts Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 pts Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA PRICE-I
10.0 pts Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
9.0 pts Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
8.0 pts Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
7.0 pts Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
6.0 pts Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0.0 pts Level 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 90.0
