Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions.
When turning in the final submission, please arrange the elements in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Please look at the attachments. This is a continuation of an assignment. APA formating is very strict.
Critique of Research Studies Part 3
1
NOT SUBMITTED
0.00%
2
UNSATISFACTORY
75.00%
3
LESS THAN SATISFACTORY
80.00%
4
SATISFACTORY
88.00%
5
GOOD
92.00%
6
EXCELLENT
100.00%
70.0 %Content
14.0 %Quantitative Results: Data analysis and findings.
None
Critique is missing for quantitative results.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative results components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative results components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative results components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative results components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
11.0 %Quantitative Discussion: Interpretation of the findings and implications/recommendations
None
Critique is missing for quantitative discussion.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
10.0 %Quantitative Global Issues: Presentation, researcher credibility, and summary assessment
None
Critique is missing for quantitative global issues.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative global issues components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative global issues components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative global issues components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative global issues components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
14.0 %Qualitative Results: Data analysis, findings, and theoretical integrations
None
Critique is missing for qualitative Results.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative results components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative results components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. . Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative results components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative results components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
11.0 %Qualitative Discussion: Interpretation of the findings and implications/recommendations
None
Critique is missing for qualitative Discussion.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative discussion components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative discussion components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
10.0 %Qualitative Global Issues: Presentation, researcher credibility, and summary assessment
None
Critique is missing for qualitative global issues.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative global issues components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative global issues components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative global issues components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
20.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
None
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)
None
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
None
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
