choose any of these 2 options and write 3 full pages double spaced not including title and references pages!!
Do not plagiarise and go through grammarly and plagiarism checker before uploading the final answer!
Will provide the textbook example for this paper soon
OPTION #1: WBS AND ACTIVITY NETWORK
Select a project with which you are familiar or one you identify through research, or a project that involves community engagement (e.g., your experience after being involved in a community service or volunteer work) and develop a WBS similar to Figure 6.6 in your textbook. Your WBS should contain no fewer Steps and sub-steps than the example. Develop an activity network for your project similar to those shown in Figures 8.2 and 8.3 of your textbook, but specific to your chosen project. Your WBS and activity network should be included in an appendix after your references page. The body of your paper should describe the project in no more than a half-page. Additionally, describe what a WBS and activity network are and how to develop them, and clarify your project in words to support your appendices. The appendices should include calculations, diagrams, and table.
Submission Requirements
Prepare a 3- to 4-page paper (not including the required title and reference pages and the appendix with your WBS and network diagram) detailing and compiling the specifics of your information.
Support your paper with a minimum of two current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library, in addition to any course textbooks or lecture material you decide to use.
Format your entire paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
Be clear, concise, and focused. Be sure to organize your writing properly and include an introduction; headings/subheadings for the body of your work; analysis and recommendations (if applicable); a conclusion; list of references; and an appendix.
OPTION #2: WBS AND RACI MATRIX
Select a project with which you are familiar or one you identify through research, or a project that involves community engagement (e.g., your experience after being involved in a community service or volunteer work) and develop a WBS similar to Figure 6.6 in your textbook. Your WBS should contain no fewer Steps and sub-steps than the example. Develop a RACI matrix for your project similar to that shown in Figure 6.9 of your textbook, but specific to your chosen project. Your WBS and RACI matrix should be included in an appendix after your references page. The body of your paper should describe the project in no more than a half-page. Additionally, describe what a WBS and RACI matrix are, how to develop them, and clarify your project in words to support your appendices.
Submission Requirements
Prepare a 3- to 4-page paper (not including the required title and reference pages and the with your WBS and RACI diagram) detailing and compiling the specifics of your information.
Support your paper with a minimum of two current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library, in addition to any course textbooks or lecture material you decide to use.
Format your entire paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
Be clear, concise, and focused. Be sure to organize your writing properly and include an introduction; headings/subheadings for the body of your work; analysis and recommendations (if applicable); a conclusion; list of references; and an appendix.
Rubric
PJM310 Mod 4 CT
PJM310 Mod 4 CT
CRITERIA RATINGS PTS
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
20.0 to >16.0pts
Meets Expectation
This response includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
16.0 to >12.0pts
Approaches Expectation
This response includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
12.0 to >8.0pts
Below Expectation
This response includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
This response includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
20.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
30.0 to >24.0pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the project management concepts.
24.0 to >18.0pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts.
18.0 to >12.0pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts.
12.0 to >0pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the project management concepts.
30.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
20.0 to >16.0pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.
12.0 to >8.0pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omission in analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide analysis of and critical thinking about the project management concepts.
20.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style
20.0 to >16.0pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
16.0 to >12.0pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and well written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
12.0 to >8.0pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well organized or well written and/or is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
20.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
10.0 to >8.0pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error.
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6.0 to >4.0pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors.
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors.
10.0pts
Total Points: 100.0
Next
